Conceptual PlayWorld as a STEAM Pedagogy for Enhancing Early Childhood Teachers’ Science Teaching Competence

Citra Wahyuni; Ridho Hanan Asrowi

doi:10.58797/cser.040101

Authors

Citra Wahyuni Islamic Psychology Department, Islamic Psychology Faculty of UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Lampung, 35131, Indonesia
Ridho Hanan Asrowi Physics Department, Science Technology Faculty, Institut Teknologi dan Sains Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung, Lampung, 35131, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58797/cser.040101

Keywords:

conceptual playworld, early childhood education, mixed methods, science learning, teacher competence

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Conceptual PlayWorld approach in improving early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ competence in science teaching. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study involved four early childhood teachers participating in a Conceptual PlayWorld professional development program. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the research involved four ECE teachers as participants. Quantitative data were collected through a pre–posttest questionnaire consisting of 10 items measuring science teaching competence in play-based contexts. Qualitative data were obtained through participatory observations, semi-structured interviews, and teachers’ reflective notes. The results demonstrate an increase in teachers’ average competence scores from 2.85 (low category) to 4.10 (high category). A paired sample t-test confirmed a significant improvement (t = 4.73, p < .05). Qualitative findings revealed three major themes: (1) increased teacher confidence in responding to children’s scientific questions; (2) enhanced ability to design imaginative play-based activities to connect scientific concepts; and (3) shifts in teachers’ attitudes toward science teaching, viewing it as enjoyable and contextually meaningful. The study concludes that the Conceptual PlayWorld approach effectively strengthens conceptual understanding, pedagogical competence, and teachers’ readiness to integrate play-based science activities in early childhood settings. The findings highlight the need for continuous professional development and the establishment of mentoring models that support play-based science inquiry for ECE teachers in Indonesia. Although the intervention focused primarily on science learning, the findings demonstrate the potential of Conceptual PlayWorld to support integrated STEAM pedagogies by connecting scientific inquiry with storytelling, creativity, problem-solving, and interdisciplinary thinking.

References

Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–535). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5–6), 23–37.

Bourha, D., Hatzigianni, M., Sidiropoulou, T., & Vitoulis, M. (2026). From blocks to bots: The stem potential of technology-enhanced toys in early childhood education. Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010161

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Bubiková-Moan, J., Hjetland, H. N., & Wollscheid, S. (2019). ECE teachers’ views on play-based learning: A systematic review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(6), 776–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1678717

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4674-X.

Fleer, M. (2009). Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in “a roundabout way” in play-based contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801953161

Fleer, M. (2021). Conceptual PlayWorlds: The role of imagination in play and learning. Early Years, 41(4), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1549024.

Gangal, M., Çalık, M., & Ozturk, Y. (2026). Effectiveness of early childhood science activities in promoting scientific literacy: A meta-analysis study. Science & Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-026-00748-2

Junaedi, E., Cahyani, A., & Prastika, L. R. (2023). Analysis of Science Activities at the Early Childhood Level: A Case Study of Teachers’ Topics and Challenges in Bandung City and Bandung Regency. KIDDO: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 1–13.

Kesner Baruch, Y., Mevarech, Z., & Spektor‐Levy, O. (2025). Preschoolers” scientific curiosity and inquiry capabilities: An ecological research approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70019

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.

Mubarok, H., Hwang, G.-J., & Lin, C.-J. (2025). Incorporating spirituality and art factors into interdisciplinary tasks: Project-based STREAM, STEAM, and STEM approaches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10571-1

Nirmala, D., & Fitria, N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Guru dalam Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Sains AUD Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 765–776.

https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.469.

Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063

OECD. (2017). Starting Strong V: Early Childhood Education Framework.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Putri, E.C., & Sugito. (2021).Pola Pembelajaran Sains di Prasekolah. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(2), 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1571.

Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Fleer, M. (2008). Play and learning in early childhood: International perspectives. Springer.

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-7.

Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.717032

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202.

Verma, V., & Babu M, S. (2026). Learning, Unlearning, Relearning Strategies for 21st century learners to tackle the digital learning paradox. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.32674/v2j8aa74

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Worth, K., & Grollman, S. (2003). Worms, shadows, and whirlpools: Science in the early childhood classroom. Heinemann.

Yoon, S. A., Shim, J., Cottone, A., Miller, K., & Noushad, N. (2026). making the case to improve teachers’ stem-integrated content knowledge: an analysis of teachers’ adaptive expertise and impacts on student classroom experiences. International Journal of STEM Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00617-y