Augmented Reality-Assisted Multiliteracy Learning and Reading Comprehension among Students

Authors

  • Monica Syafitri Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Nurita Bayu Kusmayusi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Edi Puryanto Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58797/cser.040203

Keywords:

multiliteracy, augmented reality, reading comprehension, multimodal reading

Abstract

Reading lessons now include more than printed words. Students often need to connect text with visual and digital information. We examined reading comprehension in a Grade 7th class that used a multiliteracy model supported by augmented reality (AR). We used a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design. Sixty students from one of public school in Jakarta took part. Thirty students learned with the AR-assisted multiliteracy model, and 30 students received regular text-based instruction. We used a reading comprehension test and analyzed the scores with descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, direct group comparisons, and Hedges’ g. Both groups improved from pretest to posttest (p < .001). The control group gained 11.97 points, while the experimental group gained 17.20 points. The experimental group also had a higher posttest mean, t(58) = 4.10, p < .001. The standardized posttest difference was large (Hedges’ g = 1.04). The results show that AR can support reading when teachers use it as part of a clear multiliteracy lesson. AR supported meaning making by presenting visual and contextual information alongside the text. It complemented reading activities without replacing them.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Bursalı, H., & Yılmaz, R. M. (2019). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students' reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.035

Cai, Y., Pan, Z., & Liu, M. (2022). Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 929-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12661

Chang, K.-E., Tai, Y.-W., Liu, T.-C., & Sung, Y.-T. (2024). Embedding dialog reading into AR picture books. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 3931-3947. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2192758

Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044

Danaei, D., Jamali, H. R., Mansourian, Y., & Rastegarpour, H. (2020). Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks. Computers & Education, 153, 103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103900

de-la-Peña, C., Chaves-Yuste, B., & Luque-Rojas, M.-J. (2024). Digital reading comprehension: Multimodal and monomodal inputs under debate. Reading Psychology, 45(5), 500-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2339809

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003

Ebadi, S., & Ashrafabadi, F. (2022). An exploration into the impact of augmented reality on EFL learners' reading comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9745-9765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11021-8

Garzón, J., Kinshuk, Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334

Lai, A.-F., Chen, C.-H., & Lee, G.-Y. (2019). An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students' science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12716

Mills, K. A., Brown, A., & Moro, C. (2025). Virtual and augmented reality text environments support self-directed multimodal reading. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(9), 5460-5479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2482594

Niklas, F., Jester, M., Ehmig, S. C., Bauer, K., Bertel, S., Birnbaum, L., Blank, S., Brendel-Kepser, I., Delucchi Danhier, R., Ernst, T., Gogolin, I., Hartmann, K., Heinzelmann, A., Kröner, S., Konerding, M., Krug, F., Lachmann, T., Ludewig, U., Neumann, A., . . . John, P. (2026). Reading competencies in a digital age: New directions and challenges of digital approaches to support reading. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41, Article 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-026-01165-3

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Oakley, G., Dawson, V., & Pegrum, M. (2025). Using extended reality (XR) technologies to teach literacy in primary school science within a 5E instructional model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(4), 1269-1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2446792

Parandhama, A. (2025). Empowering adolescent emergent readers in government schools: An exploration of multimodal texts as pathways to comprehension. Literacy Research and Instruction, 64(4), 411-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2024.2357101

Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Sun, Y. (2023). The effects of processing multimodal texts in print and digitally on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 91(4), 599-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2092831

Şimşek, B., & Direkçi, B. (2023). The effects of augmented reality storybooks on student's reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 754-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13293

Şimşek, B., Direkci, B., Koparan, B., Canbulat, M., Gülmez, M., & Nalçacıgil, E. (2025). Examining the effect of augmented reality experience duration on reading comprehension and cognitive load. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1445-1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12864-z

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

Wang, Q., Mahmood, H., Wali, A., Saqib, M., & Aziz, A. (2026). Utilizing augmented reality to bridge the gap between reading and technology usage in children: A user study. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(6), 4360-4374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2597530

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

Syafitri, M., Kusmayusi, N. B., & Puryanto, E. (2026). Augmented Reality-Assisted Multiliteracy Learning and Reading Comprehension among Students. Current STEAM and Education Research, 4(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.58797/cser.040203

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.