How Important Learning Media for In-Service Science Teacher

Authors

  • Handjoko Permana Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Fauzi Bakri Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Dewi Muliyati Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Mutoharoh Department of Industry Engineering, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jl. Raya Jatiwaringin, Kota Bekasi, Jawa Barat 13077, Indonesia
  • Putri Marsha Sabrina Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • M. Rizki Diva M Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Siti Rachmawati Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia
  • Gustama Wibawa R Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta 13220, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58797/

Keywords:

science teacher, STEM, teaching module

Abstract

This training on developing STEM-based teaching modules aims to equip science teachers with the knowledge and tools needed to create teaching materials, such as modules, that will be used in classroom learning. The development of modules is not only relevant to the curriculum but also capable of integrating STEM concepts. This STEM-based teaching module can enhance critical thinking skills and foster students' creativity to face the challenges of the 21st century. The method in this training session began with the presentation of material on STEM education, guidelines for module development, explanations of examples and types of teaching modules, and provided teachers with the opportunity to collaborate or discuss with the facilitators. Because the module that has been developed is expected to integrate STEM concepts into learning materials both in the classroom and during independent study.  Thus, in this training, it is hoped that it can have a positive impact on both teachers and students so that it can be implemented effectively in the classroom with a more interactive and innovative approach, thereby increasing students' interest in learning and enhancing their ability to solve complex problems. 

References

Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x

Bradbury, L. U., & Wilson, R. E. (2020). Questioning the prevailing narrative about elementary science teachers: An analysis of the experiences of science teacher enthusiasts. Science Education, 104(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21574

Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chapah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064

Dombrovski, A. Y., & Hallquist, M. N. (2021). Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior. WIREs Cognitive Science, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1561

Fairhurst, N., Koul, R., & Sheffield, R. (2023). Students’ perceptions of their STEM learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09463-z

Girón-García, C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2023). Science dissemination videos as multimodal supporting resources for ESP teaching in higher education. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.005

Goode, E., Nieuwoudt, J., & Roche, T. (2022). Does online engagement matter? The impact of interactive learning modules and synchronous class attendance on student achievement in an immersive delivery model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7929

Grabau, L. J. (2022). Engaging Students in Sustainable Science Education. Sustainability, 14(10), 6127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106127

Grant, W., Adan, M. A., Samurkas, C. A., Quigee, D., Benitez, J., Gray, B., Carnevale, C., Gordon, R. J., Castor, D., Zucker, J., & Sobieszczyk, M. E. (2023). Effect of Participative Web-Based Educational Modules on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Competency Among Medical Students: Single-Arm Interventional Study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e42197. https://doi.org/10.2196/42197

Jensen, B., & Kimmons, R. (2022). How OER can support teacher collaborative learning to enact equitable teaching practices. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(5), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-12-2021-0230

Jordens, X., Wilmart, R., Garone, E., Kinnaert, M., & Catoire, L. (2022). A Project-Based Learning Approach for Building an Affordable Control Teaching Lab: The Centrifugal Ring Positioner. IEEE Access, 10, 4907–4918. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3141588

Kannan, V., Warriem, J. M., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2022). Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0

Karcher, E. L., Koltes, D., Wenner, B., & Wells, J. (2021). Sparking curiosity and engagement through online curriculum. Poultry Science, 101(2), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101577

Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Science & Education, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1

Leyton-Román, M., González-Vélez, J. J. L., Batista, M., & Jiménez-Castuera, R. (2020). Predictive Model for Amotivation and Discipline in Physical Education Students Based on Teaching–Learning Styles. Sustainability, 13(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010187

Mateos-Núñez, M., Martínez-Borreguero, G., & Naranjo-Correa, F. L. (2020). Learning Science in Primary Education with STEM Workshops: Analysis of Teaching Effectiveness from a Cognitive and Emotional Perspective. Sustainability, 12(8), 3095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083095

McLure, F. (2022). The Thinking Frames Approach: Improving High School Students’ Written Explanations of Phenomena in Science. Research in Science Education, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10052-y

Muliyati, D., Permana, H., Rahma, K. A., Sumardani, D., & Ambarwulan, D. (2024). Gamifying thermodynamics topic in physics subject using classcraft: A joyful learning approach. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116(3116), 040013–040013. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0210206

Muliyati, D., Purwahida, R., Yanez, M. A., Permana, H., Sabrina, P. M., Zain, N. T., Sholina, W., & Rachman, G. W. (2023). The Training of STEM-Robotic as Project-Based Learning for Elementary Schools. Prosiding Seminar Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat , 1(1). https://doi.org/10.58797/sppkm.01.06

Nasbey, H., Sabrina, P. M., Sari, N. L. K., & Muliyati, D. (2024). The Implementation of the Dilemma-STEAM Model in Fluid Dynamics Subjects through the Archimedes Screw Project. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.10116

Neves, J. (2022). Project-based learning for the development of social transformative competence in socially engaged translators. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 16(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399x.2022.2084258

Nilsson, P., & Lund, J. (2022). Design for learning – involving teachers in digital didactic design (D3). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(1), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2021-0143

O’Dwyer, A., Hourigan, M., Leavy, A., & Corry, E. (2023). “I Have Seen STEM in Action and It’s Quite Do-able!” The Impact of an Extended Professional Development Model on Teacher Efficacy in Primary STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10361-2

O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7

Panchanathan, S. (2023). STEM must meet people where they are. Science, 380(6645), 563–563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi5538

Pérez-Garcias, A., Tur, G., Moral, S. V., & Darder-Mesquida, A. (2022). Flexible Learning Itineraries in Digital Environments for Personalised Learning in Teacher Training. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32326

Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2020). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1

Rajan, K. K., & Pandit, A. S. (2022). Comparing computer-assisted learning activities for learning clinical neuroscience: a randomized control trial. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03578-2

Ramos, J. L., Cattaneo, A. A. P., de Jong, F. P. C. M., & Espadeiro, R. G. (2021). Pedagogical models for the facilitation of teacher professional development via video-supported collaborative learning. A review of the state of the art. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1911720

Reyna, J., Hanham, J., Vlachopoulos, P., & Meier, P. (2021). A Systematic Approach to Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Learner-Generated Digital Media (LGDM) Assignments and Its Effect on Self-regulation in Tertiary Science Education. Research in Science Education, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09885-x

Sari, I. Y., & Yurnetti, Y. (2022). Meta Analysisi Of The Influence Of Media Learning Science On The Competency Of First School Student. Universe, 3(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.24036/universe.v3i2.208

Schmidthaler, E., Hörmann, C., Rottenhofer, M., Sabitzer, B., & Lavicza, Z. (2023). The implementation of learning apps in biological education: a quantitative study of the current situation in Austria. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-12-2022-0094

Schnieders, E., Röhr, F., Mbewe, M., Shanzi, A., Berner-Rodoreda, A., Barteit, S., Louis, V. R., Andreadis, P., Syakantu, G., & Neuhann, F. (2022). Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Medical Education, 8(1), e34751. https://doi.org/10.2196/34751

Shehaj, A. (2022). Revolutionized learning: Education policy and digital reform in the eurozone. European Policy Analysis, 8(3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1158

Siantuba, J., Nkhata, L., & de Jong, T. (2023). The impact of an online inquiry-based learning environment addressing misconceptions on students’ performance. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00236-y

Sofi-Karim, M., Bali, A. O., & Rached, K. (2022). Online education via media platforms and applications as an innovative teaching method. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11188-0

Sorkun, M. F., Yurt, O., & Hsuan, J. (2022). Service modularity in e-learning programs: an analysis from the perceived usefulness perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(5), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-09-2021-0598

Stieglitz, V., Buggenhagen, H., Strelow, K.-U., Schmidtmann, I., Skala, C., & Kurz, S. (2023). Action competence in obstetric emergencies—can this be achieved via e-learning? Interprofessional blended learning module on diagnostics and emergency treatment of shoulder dystocia. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04335-9

Thongchotchat, V., Kudo, Y., Okada, Y., & Sato, K. (2023). Educational Recommendation System Utilizing Learning Styles: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 11, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3238417

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2022). Impacts of Digital Technologies on Education and Factors Influencing schools’ Digital Capacity and transformation: a Literature Review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(28), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Wen, Y., Wu, L., He, S., Hsien-Ern Ng, N., Teo, B. C., Looi, C. K., & Cai, Y. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into inquiry-based learning approach in primary science classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10235-y

Zhao, D., Muntean, C. H., Chis, A. E., Rozinaj, G., & Muntean, G.-M. (2022). Game-Based Learning: Enhancing Student Experience, Knowledge Gain, and Usability in Higher Education Programming Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2021.3136914

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

How Important Learning Media for In-Service Science Teacher. (2024). Mitra Teras: Jurnal Terapan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.58797/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)